Archive for the ‘Apologia’ Category

American Muslim

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

For the first half-decade of my life as a practicing Muslim, I lived in Cairo. My religious habits and ideas were shaped by devout, entrepreneurial middle-class Egypt. Though Cairo boasts a large community of European and American converts, I had very little contact with other expatriates after my first few months in the city. My avoidance of my own people was born half out of necessity and half out of disgust. I’d married into a lively, loving but very conservative Egyptian family. For their sake, I couldn’t afford the usual expat baggage: the loud, rude, self-entitled breaches of Cairene social etiquette in which the average transplant indulges long after he’s learned better. What began as a matter of cultural expediency quickly became unfeigned: I didn’t (still don’t) understand how you could live in a Muslim country, be a Muslim, and yet remain so out to lunch. There was something in the average western Muslim that seemed immune to nuance. It freaked me out. So I avoided the munaqabat white women who couldn’t speak a word of Arabic and demeaned Egyptian delivery boys (in English!) with a haughty viciousness Queen Victoria would have admired. Though American and a Muslim, I was not an American Muslim. I couldn’t unsee the ridiculous aspects of the convert community. My experience as a Muslim bore no relationship to my experience as an American; they were two sharply divergent histories.

There were upsides and downsides to this situation. The isolation was intense and sometimes brutal. Wherever I went, I was The Foreigner. (Most expats get to be A Foreigner, a white in a traveling enclave of whites and westernized elites; being The Foreigner in an otherwise homogenously Arab community is a very different experience.) The upside was that my initial experience of Islam was of a lived, breathed, vital religion. In Egypt Islam is like a natural extension of the body. It permeates and is permeated by everyday life. People may be dishonest, angry, ugly, crude, vicious, but all these things are artificial, like the industrial waste spewed into the Nile and the sky until it warps babies in the womb. They are all the result of a society squeezed until it broke and bled. When God enters a conversation, the ugliness vanishes, and the disgusting sinner who leers at girls on the subway becomes a poet. The absurdity of that–the horror of it; the wonder of it; the capacity of the divine to wheedle Its way into the grotesque–shaped my relationship with God. For good or ill. I never lost sight of the fact that when I prayed, it was not only to Al Rahman, but to Al Khafid. The Debaser. I could look at His terrible Names without flinching or rationalizing. He created beauty and filth side by side, like a hammer and an anvil, and it is for us to break or bend.

That was Cairo.

When I came back to my own country, I had a naive idea that I could go on being an American and a Muslim, and avoid learning to be an American Muslim. That lasted about six months. What miserable and laughable months. I thought I could just culture-swap–trade in the tunics for hoodies, the Arabic slang for the American slang, and go about my business. But something fundamental had been altered. The number of spaces in which I could see my friends had shrunk–I wasn’t going to go bar-hopping, or clubbing, or to nude cirque nouveau (no, not kidding), or to partially nude mermaid parades (also not kidding)–in short, my previous life as an artsy vagrant had disappeared. I had no choice. I had to find American Muslims, and figure out how they coped.

Luckily, some local Muslims found me. Being Slightly Famous has its perks, among them the fact that people read one’s books and then ask one to come talk about them. In short order my husband and I were adopted into a small but welcoming community of Arab and West African professionals, orbiting a larger community of Muslims from every conceivable background–Pakistanis, Persians, Indonesians, Cham Vietnamese, white converts, black converts, Latino converts. First generation, second generation, third generation; rich, poor, middle class. There aren’t enough of us in Seattle for much segregation. There are no ‘black mosques’, no ‘Arab mosques’. There are five mosques. You go where you’re able.

Coming from a homogenous Arab Islam, this diversity stunned me. I went to a henna party where the bride was Korean and there was a fight over whether to play bangra or rai. The women’s community felt familiar–despite the wildly conflicting backgrounds, it was a space where you kissed strangers goodbye; it was Muslim space, living space, where God was invoked like joy.

At public gatherings–fundraisers, Eid celebrations–everything changed. A kind of stage-play Sunnah took over; a robotic and ritualized showing-off. Here was the howling emptiness I sensed behind the veils of the converts in Cairo, the quiet desperation not for a religion, but for a tribe, in which the cheap signals of dress and speech are celebrated for their own sake rather than God’s. This was a space without irony or the quiet acceptance of imperfection; that supreme marriage of humor and humility that makes life bearable. This American Islam came with an Americanized vision of divinity: e pluribus unum, where diversity is celebrated because it means stronger numbers; good, because there is always war around the corner. Faith is inferior to intellectual orthodoxy. Americans are suspicious of faith. We like religion because it confirms patriotism and groupthink; but faith, faith, is dangerous. Faith is too personal, too naked. American Islam has inherited American spiritual prudery.

I believe in e Unum pluribus, so I am still a foreigner. I sit and make asides in Arabic with other transplants, who are similarly dismayed that the raw ingredients of Islam and America have not congealed in the melting pot to create something edible. They yet might. There is so much potential here. Everyone realizes–and this is something you do not find in the Middle East–that we are the people we’ve been waiting for. No one is going to create this community but us. There are no heroes waiting to take over for us milktoasts. The milktoasts are it. And by God, we’re going to take a run at things before we give up.

Friday Apologia

Friday, October 17th, 2008

Now that everyone in America is heartily sick of Rule By Evangelism, the inevitable atheist backlash seems to be underway. Last night I watched Bill Maher’s commentary on the Al Smith charitable dinner (sponsored by the Catholic Diocese of New York), and was impressed by how vigorously he tore into religion, which he calls the greatest con ever perpetrated. Along with Christopher Hitchens–a more quixotic atheist, who rejects God but buys into American eschatology without reservation–Maher is a herald of change. Strange as it may seem, I think that change is positive. The world is overrun with religious fundamentalists of all stripes. A good bucket of cold water–one that encourages religious people to be a little more humble and  self-critical–is exactly what we need.

But it’s not all we need. While I think some political and social opposition to religion is healthy, the anti-spiritual current running beneath it troubles me. This trend is not only perpetrated by atheists, however–religious people are guilty of it too. We live in an excessively legalistic age, in which personal experience is disregarded when it does not conform to a certain set of cosmological or social rules.

I’ll explain. I had my first precognitive dream when I was seven. In this dream, I was looking at my aquarium: two particular fish had died, and lay in a particular position at the bottom of the tank. The next morning I bounced out of bed to inspect the tank. All the fish were quite alive. I didn’t think about the dream again until several days later, when I came back from school to discover that those two particular fish had died, and lay at the bottom of the tank in that particular position. Though I had been raised in an adamantly atheist household (there is no unseen or spiritual realm, and all things on this earth can be explained using existent scientific methods), I was unbothered by what had happened. It didn’t seem profound or even abnormal. But when I thought about telling anyone what I had seen, I felt anxious–I knew no one would believe me. And when I say no one, I mean no one: I had religious friends as well as atheist ones, and I couldn’t envision any of them reacting well to such a claim. So I kept it to myself. I would have similar small, inexplicable experiences again and again as I got older.

In my late teens, I became conscious of an enormous hypocrisy. As a good atheist, I had been taught never to disregard observable evidence, even if it contradicted a personal belief. Yet I now had an entire body of evidence that I was expected to ignore and suppress. Atheist friends and family would routinely belittle spiritual experiences, either dismissing them as invented, or explaining them with elaborate and improbable scientific theories. No one seemed willing to say “I simply don’t know why these things happen to people.” Ironically, what I first saw as a failure of atheism, I now see as a failure of atheists: if one person had said to me “There is a lot about the way the brain functions that we still don’t understand, but one day we will probably have the technology to measure and explain things like precognition”, my rebellion against my birth-philosophy might have been less angry. Today, I think it’s entirely possible that we will one day have the technology to measure and explain things like precognition. Religion, for me, does not contradict a universe governed by biology and physics.

But this anti-experiential koolaid was not passed out by atheists. It was passed out by fundamentalists. Modern fundamentalism is not an obsession with God, it is an obsession with law. Religion in the eyes of most fundamentalists is a normative, enforceable moral code, not the society of God on earth. Personal spiritual experience suggests a direct connection with the divine, one not subject to the oversight of self-appointed moral guardians. Fundamentalists would love to live in a world where miracles occur only to the stuffily pious, and not to malcontents like me.

I worry that the seeds of this same obsession with law have been planted in the burgeoning atheist movement. The laws in this case may be scientific rather than moral, but they are still laws. No philosophy is an innoculation against human nature, and all humans dislike what they can’t explain. Atheism has the potential to be less boundaried than almost any other worldview, but most atheists are as boundaried as everybody else. This is a problem. I hope the reaction against religious fundamentalism does not begin to resemble what it set out to reject. We could all do with a dose of what Amir Abdel Kader called “enlightened ignorance”, and when we come to questions we can’t answer, tell the truth: I don’t know.